# Erdős Problem 750

A statement in qed.bot, the register of claims of AI work in mathematics. The register grades the evidence attached to each claim; it never rules on whether a proof is correct.

- Identifier: erdos:750
- Collection: Erdős
- Page: https://qed.bot/s/erdos-750
- Formal record: solved; at its source: proved (Lean)
- Machine-checked: no independent check has verified it
- Fidelity F2: The statement corpus cites this proof against its own statement.
- Source: https://www.erdosproblems.com/750

## AI claims

### GPT-5.5 Pro, 3 May 2026

Full solution

- Outcome: full
- Autonomy A1: Collaborative. A human and a system worked the problem together, or the system played a supporting role.
- Evidence V1: Informal. A public write-up exists and has had community scrutiny.
- Fidelity F2: Declared. The authors record how the formal statement corresponds to the claim — a comparator challenge, an alignment table or written divergences — or a statement corpus cites the proof against its own statement.
- With: Przemek Chojecki
- Source: Erdős problems AI wiki, https://github.com/teorth/erdosproblems/wiki/AI-contributions-to-Erd%C5%91s-problems

### GPT-5, 13 Oct 2025

Partial results found

- Outcome: partial (a supporting task)
- Autonomy A1: Collaborative. A human and a system worked the problem together, or the system played a supporting role.
- Evidence V1: Informal. A public write-up exists and has had community scrutiny.
- Fidelity F2: Declared. The authors record how the formal statement corresponds to the claim — a comparator challenge, an alignment table or written divergences — or a statement corpus cites the proof against its own statement.
- Source: Erdős problems AI wiki, https://github.com/teorth/erdosproblems/wiki/AI-contributions-to-Erd%C5%91s-problems

### Claude Code, Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5 Pro, 4 May 2026

Chojecki and GPT-5.5 Pro (2026)

- Outcome: full (a supporting task)
- Autonomy A1: Collaborative. A human and a system worked the problem together, or the system played a supporting role.
- Evidence V1: Informal. A public write-up exists and has had community scrutiny.
- Fidelity F2: Declared. The authors record how the formal statement corresponds to the claim — a comparator challenge, an alignment table or written divergences — or a statement corpus cites the proof against its own statement.
- Source: Erdős problems AI wiki, https://github.com/teorth/erdosproblems/wiki/AI-contributions-to-Erd%C5%91s-problems

## Formal statements

- FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/750.lean, https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/main/FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/750.lean

Cite as: qed.bot, "Erdős Problem 750", https://qed.bot/s/erdos-750, as of 30 Sep 2026. The register's data is published under CC BY 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/