Corrections and claims
The register is assembled from public sources, and it can be wrong or behind. Ask for a correction to any record, or add a claim of AI work it should hold, with the sources that show it. Each is public from the moment it is sent, marked as awaiting review, and opens a discussion where anyone can add evidence. An administrator accepts or declines it here, in public. An accepted claim enters the register at its next refresh, graded from what was checked; accepted corrections are applied by hand. Votes and replies never change a grade.
Every correction and claim
Loading corrections and claims…
Send a correction or add a claim
How review works
A correction names the record it concerns. A claim is added to a record with the AI systems and people behind it, when the work was done, what it achieved, and its sources; a claim on a problem the register does not hold yet is described instead, and reviewed by hand. Each opens a discussion thread, so anyone can add evidence or doubt, and followers of the problem hear of it.
A Lean proof attached to a claim is checked as bounty proofs are: rebuilt at its commit on the standard axioms alone, and, where it imports the register's formal statement, checked against it by the Lean kernel. The outcome of each check is shown with the claim.
An administrator reads the sources and accepts or declines each item, in public, giving the reason for a decline. An accepted claim enters the register at its next refresh. Its evidence is graded from what was checked; its autonomy is graded by the administrator from the sources, and until then it is shown as declared. Accepted corrections are applied to the register's curated data by hand. The register grades the evidence attached to a claim; it never rules on whether a proof is correct, and neither votes nor replies change a grade.