qedbot

Erdős·erdos:106

Erdős 106

problem formal record: unclassified source: disproved (Lean) F0 no formal statement

No formal proof attached. Any claim here rests on a write-up or a report.

Fidelity F0: Absent. No formal statement is attached to the result.

geometry·Source

AI activity

How grades work
Aristotle

10 Dec 2025·supporting task

Baek, Koizumi, and Ueoro (2024)

partial A1 V1 F0
Reasoning and sources

Autonomy

Secondary contribution: formalization

Details

proof to formalize: Baek, Koizumi, and Ueoro (2024)

Claimed on erdosproblems.com

1

Proof claims posted on erdosproblems.com, which says that listing a claim “is no guarantee of proof correctness”. The register records who claims what, with which systems, and links to each claim there. Nobody has examined them, and none counts in the register's totals.

Conner Silverstein

a full proof claimed·29 Jul 2026·using Claude Opus 5 (construction, search, exact verification), ChatGPT, Grok (independent review)·5 comments there

Proof

candidateA? V0

F0 no formal statement. Absent. No formal statement is attached to the result.

Follow and discuss

All discussion

Discussion and bounties for this problem load here.

Something wrong or missing here? Request a correction or add a claim, with its sources.

Formal material

Formal statements · 0

No formal statement located.

Cited proofs · 0

No proof artifact cited by the formal record.

Recorded elsewhere

Compare the registries
  • vibemathed — Erdős Problem #106

    checked·human-led·their labels: lean-verified, ai-assisted

Also known as · 1
  • https://www.erdosproblems.com/106

Cite this record

qed.bot, “Erdős 106”, https://qed.bot/s/erdos-106, as of 30 Sep 2026.

This record as plain text, with each claim, its grades and its sources.