qedbot

Erdős·erdos:266

Erdős Problem 266

problem formal record: solved source: disproved (Lean) F2 declared

No independent check recorded yet. A formal artifact, declaration or published object is attached, but no rebuild of it is recorded here.

A Palomar registration names this problem. It is shown below but not counted as a check of the claim.

Fidelity F2: The correspondence is declared through an alignment table and written divergences.

irrationality·Source

AI activity

How grades work

No AI contribution recorded against this statement.

F2 declared. The correspondence is declared through an alignment table and written divergences.

declares divergences from its source declares 2 unproved goals reviewed by its authors only

Checks

1
  • verified·Palomar

    Registered by Palomar at aa0cd43f: Comparator confirmed 2 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel. The project names this problem, which does not establish that it proves the result claimed here, so it is not counted as a check of it

    project registered at a pinned commit·2026-08-20·commit aa0cd43fb45d

    PALOMAR-2026-08-20-000008 — names this problem; not counted as a check of the claim

Declared by the projects

1

As each project's formalization.yaml states it.

Erdős problem #266: the Kovač–Tao disproof of Stolarsky's conjecturebenkeene/erdos266 · joined by names · Palomar

Read formalization.yaml

authors
Ben Keene
method
agent — Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic)
review
self-assessed (Ben Keene)
axioms
Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext
sorry
2 unproved goals declared
sources
On several irrationality problems for Ahmes series — formalizes; Erdős problem #266 (erdosproblems.com) — background; Formal Conjectures: ErdosProblems/266.lean — adapts
divergences
The arXiv abstract of [KoTa24] states the final construction for integer shifts (t in Z) only; the body of the paper proves more. Checked against arXiv v4 (14 Jul 2025): Erdos266.erdos_266_rational_shifts is Theorem 2.11 verbatim — a strictly increasing sequence of positive integers whose shifted series converges to a rational for every t in Q avoiding {-a_n} — and Section 2.3 states explicitly that the conjecture is disproved "not only when t ranges over the integers" but for rational t. Erdos266.erdos_266 is the negative answer to Stolarsky's conjecture as recorded by Erdős–Graham (integer shifts t >= 1), implied by Theorem 2.11. "Converges to a rational" is rendered as HasSum toward the real embedding of a rational; for these series (all but finitely many terms positive) unconditional and ordered convergence agree.
checked by
Palomar

Follow and discuss

All discussion

Discussion and bounties for this problem load here.

Something wrong or missing here? Request a correction or add a claim, with its sources.

Formal material

Formal statements · 1
Cited proofs · 1
Also known as · 3
  • https://www.erdosproblems.com/266
  • https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/main/FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/266.lean
  • FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/266.lean

Cite this record

qed.bot, “Erdős Problem 266”, https://qed.bot/s/erdos-266, as of 30 Sep 2026.

This record as plain text, with each claim, its grades and its sources.