qedbot

Erdős·erdos:366

Erdős Problem 366

conjecture formal record: mixed source: verifiable F0 no formal statement

No formal proof attached. Any claim here rests on a write-up or a report.

Fidelity F0: Absent. No formal statement is attached to the result.

number theory, powerful·Source

AI activity

How grades work
Automated research pipeline

14 Apr 2026

Conditional partial result

partial A3 V1 F0
Reasoning and sources

Autonomy

AI standalone, with comparable literature existing

Details

literature: 🟡 Aktaş and Murty (2017)

literature found on: 15 Apr, 2026

similar?: Yes

Claimed on erdosproblems.com

1

Proof claims posted on erdosproblems.com, which says that listing a claim “is no guarantee of proof correctness”. The register records who claims what, with which systems, and links to each claim there. Nobody has examined them, and none counts in the register's totals.

Theofil Xeff

a partial proof claimed·22 Jul 2026·using GPT 5.6 Sol high, Fable 5 high·1 comment there

Proof·Formalisation at commit 866c5c5e2158

candidateA? V0

F0 no formal statement. Absent. No formal statement is attached to the result.

Follow and discuss

All discussion

Discussion and bounties for this problem load here.

Something wrong or missing here? Request a correction or add a claim, with its sources.

Formal material

Formal statements · 1
Cited proofs · 0

No proof artifact cited by the formal record.

Also known as · 3
  • https://www.erdosproblems.com/366
  • https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/main/FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/366.lean
  • FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/366.lean

Cite this record

qed.bot, “Erdős Problem 366”, https://qed.bot/s/erdos-366, as of 30 Sep 2026.

This record as plain text, with each claim, its grades and its sources.