Erdős·erdos:571
Erdős Problem 571
No independent check recorded yet. A formal artifact, declaration or published object is attached, but no rebuild of it is recorded here.
Fidelity F2: The correspondence is declared through an alignment table and written divergences.
graph theory, turan number·Source
AI activity
How grades workNo AI contribution recorded against this statement.
Claimed on erdosproblems.com
1Proof claims posted on erdosproblems.com, which says that listing a claim “is no guarantee of proof correctness”. The register records who claims what, with which systems, and links to each claim there. Nobody has examined them, and none counts in the register's totals.
Fidelity
How fidelity is gradedF2 declared. The correspondence is declared through an alignment table and written divergences.
Declared by the projects
1As each project's formalization.yaml states it.
Erdős problem #571 (rational exponents for Turán numbers of bipartite graphs): proof
- method
- autonomous — GPT-6 Astra (pre-release version, OpenAI)
- review
- other — mechanically verified (comparator: lean kernel replay, standard axioms only) in the benchmark harness and again in this repository's ci; preliminary informal reading of the argument by thomas f. bloom; no independent refereeing (Thomas F. Bloom)
- sorry
- 0 unproved goals declared
- sources
- Proof of Erdős problem #571: For every rational α ∈ [1,2) there is a bipartite graph G with ex(n; G) ≍ n^α. — other; Erdős problem #571 (erdosproblems.com) — background; Rational exponents in extremal graph theory — background; Cube-supersaturated graphs and related problems — background
- related
- epoch-research/LeanOpenProblems/blob/77882c437ca1dfefab3b27fa00f1d29788100311/apn/data/erdos_autoformalized/Isolated/Erdos571.erdos_571.lean — builds-on
- divergences
- The compared theorem is the benchmark's formalisation of the erdosproblems.com statement. `extremalNumber n G` is Mathlib's Turán number (maximum edge count of a `G`-free simple graph on `Fin n`); `G.IsBipartite` is Mathlib's bipartiteness; `Asymptotics.IsTheta atTop` encodes `≍` (two-sided `≪`) for `n → ∞`, with both sides cast to `ℝ` and `n^α` read as the real power `(n : ℝ) ^ (α : ℝ)`. The graph lives on `Fin q`, which loses no generality. No divergence from the informal statement is known. The relation between this proof and the substantial existing literature (Bukh–Conlon and later work) has not yet been worked out.
- checked by
- nobody independent of its authors yet
Follow and discuss
All discussionFollow this problem
An email when it has a new claim, check, bounty or discussion. You confirm once and can stop with one click.
Discussion and bounties for this problem load here.
Seen recently
What the monitors picked up in the last thirty days, not yet graded.
Something wrong or missing here? Request a correction or add a claim, with its sources.
Claims and corrections from readers
All of themFormal material
Formal statements · 1
Also known as · 3
- https://www.erdosproblems.com/571
- https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/main/FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/571.lean
- FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/571.lean
Cite this record
qed.bot, “Erdős Problem 571”, https://qed.bot/s/erdos-571, as of 30 Sep 2026.