Erdős·erdos:625
Erdős 625
No independent check recorded yet. A formal artifact, declaration or published object is attached, but no rebuild of it is recorded here.
A Palomar registration names this problem. It is shown below but not counted as a check of the claim.
Fidelity F2: The correspondence is declared through an alignment table and written divergences.
graph theory, chromatic number·Source
AI activity
How grades workNo AI contribution recorded against this statement.
Claimed on erdosproblems.com
2Proof claims posted on erdosproblems.com, which says that listing a claim “is no guarantee of proof correctness”. The register records who claims what, with which systems, and links to each claim there. Nobody has examined them, and none counts in the register's totals.
Fidelity
How fidelity is gradedF2 declared. The correspondence is declared through an alignment table and written divergences.
Checks
1-
verified·Palomar
Registered by Palomar at 9702b5e7: Comparator confirmed 2 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel. The project names this problem, which does not establish that it proves the result claimed here, so it is not counted as a check of it
Declared by the projects
1As each project's formalization.yaml states it.
Erdős Problem 625: chromatic versus cochromatic number of a random graph
- method
- agent — OpenAI GPT-5 family
- review
- self-assessed — self-assessed with independent kernel replay; not peer-reviewed
- axioms
- Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext
- sorry
- 0 unproved goals declared
- sources
- Erdős Problem 625: manuscript and Lean formalization — other, authors participated; Some Problems and Results in Cochromatic Theory — background, authors n/a; The Difference Between the Chromatic and the Cochromatic Number of a Random Graph — background, authors not-contacted
- divergences
- The formal theorem matches the manuscript's uniform quantitative result. It omits only the stronger nonconstant phase-resolved refinement, as stated explicitly in the scope field.
- checked by
- Palomar
Follow and discuss
All discussionFollow this problem
An email when it has a new claim, check, bounty or discussion. You confirm once and can stop with one click.
Discussion and bounties for this problem load here.
Seen recently
What the monitors picked up in the last thirty days, not yet graded.
Something wrong or missing here? Request a correction or add a claim, with its sources.
Claims and corrections from readers
All of themFormal material
Formal statements · 0
No formal statement located.
Cited proofs · 0
No proof artifact cited by the formal record.
Also known as · 1
- https://www.erdosproblems.com/625
Cite this record
qed.bot, “Erdős 625”, https://qed.bot/s/erdos-625, as of 30 Sep 2026.