Erdős·erdos:659
Erdős Problem 659
No formal proof attached. Any claim here rests on a write-up or a report.
Fidelity F0: Absent. No formal statement is attached to the result.
geometry, distances·Source
AI activity
How grades workFull solution
Reasoning and sources
Autonomy
AI standalone, with comparable literature existing
Details
literature: 🟡 Sheffer and Lund (2014); 🟢 Grayzel (2026)
literature found on: 2 Feb, 2026; 14 Jan, 2026
similar?: Yes
Sources
Full solution
Reasoning and sources
Autonomy
AI collaborating with humans
Sources
Partial results, upgradeable to full solution, found
Reasoning and sources
Autonomy
Secondary contribution: literature search
Sources
Gemini and Grayzel (2026)
Reasoning and sources
Autonomy
Secondary contribution: formalization
Details
proof to formalize: Gemini and Grayzel (2026)
Sources
Fidelity
How fidelity is gradedF0 no formal statement. Absent. No formal statement is attached to the result.
Follow and discuss
All discussionFollow this problem
An email when it has a new claim, check, bounty or discussion. You confirm once and can stop with one click.
Discussion and bounties for this problem load here.
Seen recently
What the monitors picked up in the last thirty days, not yet graded.
Something wrong or missing here? Request a correction or add a claim, with its sources.
Claims and corrections from readers
All of themFormal material
Formal statements · 1
Cited proofs · 0
No proof artifact cited by the formal record.
Recorded elsewhere
Compare the registries- vibemathed — Erdős Problem #659
Also known as · 3
- https://www.erdosproblems.com/659
- https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/main/FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/659.lean
- FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/659.lean
Cite this record
qed.bot, “Erdős Problem 659”, https://qed.bot/s/erdos-659, as of 30 Sep 2026.