qedbot

Erdős·erdos:776

Erdős 776

problem formal record: unclassified source: open F0 no formal statement

No formal proof attached. Any claim here rests on a write-up or a report.

Fidelity F0: Absent. No formal statement is attached to the result.

combinatorics·Source

AI activity

How grades work
GPT-5.2 Thinking

11 Feb 2026·with Yixin He, Quanyu Tang

Partial result

partial A1 V1 F0
Reasoning and sources

Autonomy

AI collaborating with humans

Claimed on erdosproblems.com

2

Proof claims posted on erdosproblems.com, which says that listing a claim “is no guarantee of proof correctness”. The register records who claims what, with which systems, and links to each claim there. Nobody has examined them, and none counts in the register's totals.

Gilad Ronen

a partial proof claimed·21 Jul 2026·using OpenAI Codex (initial draft), Hermes Agent / gpt-5.6-sol (audit and verifier hardening)

Proof

candidateA? V0
AI's operated by M.Thiim

a full proof claimed·17 Jul 2026·using All ideas, lean formalization due to LLM's - exact contribution of each is specified in submission package. LLM's used: OpenAI ChatGPT 5.6 Pro, Anthropic Claude Fable 5, OpenAI Codex w gpt-5.6-Sol-Max·3 comments there

Proof·Formalisation at commit 1ca432031236

candidateA? V0

Fidelity

How fidelity is graded

F0 no formal statement. Absent. No formal statement is attached to the result.

Follow and discuss

All discussion

Discussion and bounties for this problem load here.

Something wrong or missing here? Request a correction or add a claim, with its sources.

Formal material

Formal statements · 0

No formal statement located.

Cited proofs · 0

No proof artifact cited by the formal record.

Also known as · 1
  • https://www.erdosproblems.com/776

Cite this record

qed.bot, “Erdős 776”, https://qed.bot/s/erdos-776, as of 30 Sep 2026.

This record as plain text, with each claim, its grades and its sources.