Wikipedia·wikipedia:Hadamard
Hadamard's conjecture
Machine-checked by Palomar.
Fidelity F3: The project checks its proof with Comparator against a statement from a corpus written separately from the proof, and held here.
AI activity
How grades workNo AI contribution recorded against this statement.
Fidelity
How fidelity is gradedF3 anchored. The project checks its proof with Comparator against a statement from a corpus written separately from the proof, and held here.
Checks
1-
verified·Palomar
Registered by Palomar at 46544fab: Comparator confirmed 12 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel
Declared by the projects
1As each project's formalization.yaml states it.
hadamard-formal: eight Hadamard orders unrecorded in the Cati-Pasechnik database, and the Miyamoto-erratum obstruction
- authors
- JD Jones
- method
- agent — Claude Code (Fable 5), Codex (GPT 5.6 Sol), GPT 5.6 (external source review), Grok (external review; exact model not recorded)
- review
- self-assessed (JD Jones)
- axioms
- Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext
- sorry
- 0 unproved goals declared
- results
- 12 main results named, checked with Comparator, with an alignment table
- sources
- Hadamard-T: T-matrix witnesses and the Hadamard orders they close — formalizes, authors participated; Hadamard-M: an erratum at order 515, and an explicit Hadamard matrix of order 7796 — formalizes, authors participated; A construction of Hadamard matrices — background; A database of constructions of Hadamard matrices — background
- related
- leanprover-community/mathlib4/blob/v4.33.0/Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/HadamardMatrix.lean — builds-on; google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/abe6ef73129989fb8cf94edb72b1ac21d30a411b/FormalConjectures/Wikipedia/Hadamard.lean — other; Lu-Ming Zhang, Formal Verification of Constructions and Theorems on Hadamard Matrices, MSc dissertation, University of Oxford, 2021 — other
- divergences
- The formalization uses the periodic T-matrix predicate required by the Cooper-Wallis construction, not the stronger aperiodic T-sequence notion, and it proves existence without materializing the resulting large matrices. On the erratum, the displayed C2 form, the pairing consequence of the paper's hypothesis (4.1), and the emptiness of the class at every positive block order not congruent to 1 mod 4 are formalized, which closes both printed readings of the corollary's output order; what remains informal is the transcription of the printed text, human-audited in Hadamard-M, and the bibliographic propagation from the unsupported order-103 entry to the order-515 list entry and its order-2060 claim.
- checked by
- Palomar
Follow and discuss
All discussionFollow this problem
An email when it has a new claim, check, bounty or discussion. You confirm once and can stop with one click.
Discussion and bounties for this problem load here.
Seen recently
What the monitors picked up in the last thirty days, not yet graded.
Something wrong or missing here? Request a correction or add a claim, with its sources.
Claims and corrections from readers
All of themFormal material
Formal statements · 1
Cited proofs · 0
No proof artifact cited by the formal record.
Also known as · 2
- https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/main/FormalConjectures/Wikipedia/Hadamard.lean
- FormalConjectures/Wikipedia/Hadamard.lean
Cite this record
qed.bot, “Hadamard's conjecture”, https://qed.bot/s/wikipedia-hadamard, as of 30 Sep 2026.