qedbot

Wikipedia·wikipedia:Sendov

Sendov's conjecture

problem formal record: solved F2 declared

Machine-checked by Palomar.

Fidelity F2: The correspondence is declared through a Comparator challenge, an alignment table and written divergences.

Source

AI activity

How grades work

No AI contribution recorded against this statement.

F2 declared. The correspondence is declared through a Comparator challenge, an alignment table and written divergences.

declares divergences from its source reviewed by its authors only

Checks

1
  • verified·Palomar

    Registered by Palomar at 1ddea92d: Comparator confirmed 2 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel

    project registered at a pinned commit·2026-08-20·commit 1ddea92d89f9

    PALOMAR-2026-08-13-000001

Declared by the projects

1

As each project's formalization.yaml states it.

Sendov's conjecture and the Phelps-Rodriguez conjectureteorth/sendov · joined by artifact · Palomar

Read formalization.yaml

authors
Terence Tao
method
agent — Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic)
review
self-assessed (Terence Tao)
axioms
Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext
sorry
0 unproved goals declared
results
2 main results named, checked with Comparator, with an alignment table
sources
A digestion of the proof of Sendov's conjecture — formalizes; Research Problems in Function Theory (statement of Sendov's conjecture) — background; Some properties of extremal polynomials for the Ilieff conjecture — formalizes; On a problem of Ilyeff — background
divergences
Faithful to the source, and in two respects stronger than it. The blog post argues Sendov's conjecture for n >= 5; this development proves all n >= 2, adding degrees 2 to 4 in Sendov/Analytic/LowDegree.lean. The blog post states the non-strict conclusion; this development additionally extracts the Phelps-Rodriguez equality classification, strengthening the distance bound to a strict inequality except for p = c(z^n - a^n) with |a| = 1. Both are generalizations rather than weakenings: no hypothesis of the source was strengthened, and no part of its statement was dropped. One step is proved by a different route than the informal account: for n >= 101 the write-up in docs/proof-large-degree.md splits 0 <= alpha <= 17 at alpha = 16 and estimates the two pieces by exact rational endpoint bounds, whereas Sendov/LargeDegree/Endgame.lean settles the whole interval with one generated Bernstein certificate, Sendov.F_pos, which the sharp Beta constant leaves enough margin for. The conclusion is the same. Lemma names differ from the informal text throughout; the roadmap in README.md records the correspondence.
checked by
Palomar

Follow and discuss

All discussion

Discussion and bounties for this problem load here.

Something wrong or missing here? Request a correction or add a claim, with its sources.

Formal material

Formal statements · 1
Cited proofs · 1
Also known as · 2
  • https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/main/FormalConjectures/Wikipedia/Sendov.lean
  • FormalConjectures/Wikipedia/Sendov.lean

Cite this record

qed.bot, “Sendov's conjecture”, https://qed.bot/s/wikipedia-sendov, as of 30 Sep 2026.

This record as plain text, with each claim, its grades and its sources.