Wikipedia·wikipedia:Sendov
Sendov's conjecture
Machine-checked by Palomar.
Fidelity F2: The correspondence is declared through a Comparator challenge, an alignment table and written divergences.
AI activity
How grades workNo AI contribution recorded against this statement.
Fidelity
How fidelity is gradedF2 declared. The correspondence is declared through a Comparator challenge, an alignment table and written divergences.
Checks
1-
verified·Palomar
Registered by Palomar at 1ddea92d: Comparator confirmed 2 theorems prove the recorded statement within Palomar's axiom policy, replayed through Lean's kernel and the independent nanoda kernel
Declared by the projects
1As each project's formalization.yaml states it.
Sendov's conjecture and the Phelps-Rodriguez conjecture
- authors
- Terence Tao
- method
- agent — Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic)
- review
- self-assessed (Terence Tao)
- axioms
- Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext
- sorry
- 0 unproved goals declared
- results
- 2 main results named, checked with Comparator, with an alignment table
- sources
- A digestion of the proof of Sendov's conjecture — formalizes; Research Problems in Function Theory (statement of Sendov's conjecture) — background; Some properties of extremal polynomials for the Ilieff conjecture — formalizes; On a problem of Ilyeff — background
- related
- https://www.proofatlas.ai/formalizations/sendov-conjecture/ — builds-on
- divergences
- Faithful to the source, and in two respects stronger than it. The blog post argues Sendov's conjecture for n >= 5; this development proves all n >= 2, adding degrees 2 to 4 in Sendov/Analytic/LowDegree.lean. The blog post states the non-strict conclusion; this development additionally extracts the Phelps-Rodriguez equality classification, strengthening the distance bound to a strict inequality except for p = c(z^n - a^n) with |a| = 1. Both are generalizations rather than weakenings: no hypothesis of the source was strengthened, and no part of its statement was dropped. One step is proved by a different route than the informal account: for n >= 101 the write-up in docs/proof-large-degree.md splits 0 <= alpha <= 17 at alpha = 16 and estimates the two pieces by exact rational endpoint bounds, whereas Sendov/LargeDegree/Endgame.lean settles the whole interval with one generated Bernstein certificate, Sendov.F_pos, which the sharp Beta constant leaves enough margin for. The conclusion is the same. Lemma names differ from the informal text throughout; the roadmap in README.md records the correspondence.
- checked by
- Palomar
Follow and discuss
All discussionFollow this problem
An email when it has a new claim, check, bounty or discussion. You confirm once and can stop with one click.
Discussion and bounties for this problem load here.
Seen recently
What the monitors picked up in the last thirty days, not yet graded.
Something wrong or missing here? Request a correction or add a claim, with its sources.
Claims and corrections from readers
All of themFormal material
Formal statements · 1
Also known as · 2
- https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/main/FormalConjectures/Wikipedia/Sendov.lean
- FormalConjectures/Wikipedia/Sendov.lean
Cite this record
qed.bot, “Sendov's conjecture”, https://qed.bot/s/wikipedia-sendov, as of 30 Sep 2026.